Ethics intelligence

Share on linkedin
Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Share on whatsapp
Share on email

Your ability to spot ethical implications and dilemmas in your actions and decisions, in the midst of increasing complexity, change and volatility, is a skill. It takes a fair amount of understanding what ethics is at a deep level, but more importantly, constant self-reflection. Building ethics intelligence within self is important, but leaders should also work towards building organisations that are ethics intelligent.

More to explore

Silent collusions, groupthink and unbridled power

The word ‘collusion’ has its roots in Latin. The Latin prefix col-, meaning “together,” and the verb ludere, “to play,” come together to form collude. The related noun collude has the specific meaning “secret agreement or cooperation.” (Mirriam Webster dictionary). The Collins dictionary defines collusion as “to act together through a secret understanding, esp. with evil or harmful intent”.

On the face of it, it seems clear that there would need to be a conversation of sorts to reach an agreement to cooperate. The question that is plaguing me however is whether the need for a verbal conversation or written agreement is necessary to enter a collusion. Could you have two or more players playing together without any meeting, secret or not, and without a verbal or written agreement to cooperate?

2 Responses

  1. Dear Claudelle. Thank you for your talk on Ethical Intelligence. I agree with you that the “Ethics Behaviour” applies to each of us in what we say and do on a consistent basis. This is not only about fraud and corruption. I recently watched the movie called “Open Secrets” – which reflected the experiences of Katherine Gun as the Whistle blower of the company called GCHQ. She translated messages and was bound by the UK Secrecy Act. An email, sent to each person in
    GCHQ, were asked to assist in influencing the vote for the UK to join the USA in starting a war in Iraq in 2003. Her conscience, her ethics, her moral compass – in trying to stop the war from happening, in trying to saving innocent lives which would be lost unnecessarily, is what drove her to leak the email to the media. The question I have been asking myself, as a Citizen of Conscience, doing the right thing when I see unethical behaviour, contravention of Policies and Procedures, is when speaking up against this – one is marginalized, treated as an outcast, one becomes the pariah. The question begs another question – what pushes a person like Katherine Gun, Edward Snowden, Daniel Ellsberg, Anthony Russo etc. – what was different in their psyche that they took the action they did for the interest of the Public! So a very interesting topic to reflect on our own ethical choices we make when faced with such ethical dilemmas in each sphere of our lives, be in personal or career.

    1. Cynthia, you are yourself a wonderful example of bravery. A very important question we need to ask ourselves is why is it that some people are willing to pay the ultimate price and do what is right why the masses choose to keep silent. Self preservation seems to be a human aspiration that is both a blessing and a curse. Most people struggle to find the line between when self preservation is good and when it is bad for the greater good. As a society we have to ask very tough questions about the cultures we have created.

Comments are closed.

Axess Now

Get axess now