Leading your future leaders

Share on linkedin
Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Share on whatsapp
Share on email

Deloitte, in its global Millennial survey 2019 (which included Gen Zs) found that Millennials are sceptical of business’ motives. Only 49% of Millennials indicated that business leaders generally behave ethically. In addition, respondents did not think highly of leaders’ impact on society, their commitment to improving the world, or their trustworthiness.

Those in leadership positions are the template for the future leadership potential. The risk we run is that current leaders are becoming an example of opposite modelling for those in the pipeline. Young leaders in the making want to be able to look up to current leaders, and see them as setting an example of how to deal with tough situations.


Given the indications that Millennials are sceptical about business’ motives, there is clearly a need for leaders to sit up and listen. What is it that Millennials need from current leaders? What can be done to fix the situation? 

More to explore

Silent collusions, groupthink and unbridled power

The word ‘collusion’ has its roots in Latin. The Latin prefix col-, meaning “together,” and the verb ludere, “to play,” come together to form collude. The related noun collude has the specific meaning “secret agreement or cooperation.” (Mirriam Webster dictionary). The Collins dictionary defines collusion as “to act together through a secret understanding, esp. with evil or harmful intent”.

On the face of it, it seems clear that there would need to be a conversation of sorts to reach an agreement to cooperate. The question that is plaguing me however is whether the need for a verbal conversation or written agreement is necessary to enter a collusion. Could you have two or more players playing together without any meeting, secret or not, and without a verbal or written agreement to cooperate?

Axess Now

Get axess now