While facilitating an online conversation among a few high-profile women, one of the issues that came up was the fact that so many organisations have become cold places where people are treated as numbers, instead of human beings with emotions. The conversation naturally included the need to create the space for the nurturing nature of women to flourish. I have always been a firm believer in the balancing of the male and female energies in an organisation, to achieve a healthy culture. The fact that we have allowed the imbalance that has created cold, ruthless organisations to prevail, is quite an indictment. The pursuit for constant growth combined with greed are probably the most obvious root causes.

The Covid-19 pandemic and related lockdowns around the globe has put a spotlight on the need for empathy. Many have been able to display great empathy, while others have been struggling. I suspect that those organisations that have typically been bottom line driven, would have found it a lot more difficult to deal with the levels of empathy required in dealing with employees who suddenly had to go into a mini diaspora, while dealing with the inevitable bereavement that accompanied the virus as it wreaked havoc.

In addition, size often matters. In smaller organisations people tend to be closer to each other as they are a lot more interdependent, and it is therefore easier to create an empathic culture. It is much more difficult in bigger organisations where people often feel like they are just a number and easily replaceable. Human nature is also such that we tend to have greater empathy for those in our line of sight, but more particularly, those we consider to be in our “like us” group. The further people are from us, the more difficult it becomes to feel the same level of empathy. People can pass each other in the passageway, without seeing each other as part of the team they should have an empathic relationship with. We also tend to instinctively avoid empathy overload as it can be very stressful when you feel the pain of too many people at once. People generally attempt to preserve themselves by avoiding sensory and emotional overload.

However, not making an effort to increase empathy in the workplace does have consequences. There is a strong correlation between performance and empathy in the workplace. Where there is more empathy, effective communication and improved human connections tend to be more prevalent. Leaders who want to see increased performance should therefore put more effort into creating an emphatic atmosphere in their spheres of influence. There is of course also the consideration of the ethical implications of scenarios devoid of empathy, such as work overload and verbal abuse.

A study done and released by Businessolver in 2017 revealed some interesting data that point to a need to increase empathy in the workplace. Although the study was done in the US, it has implications for organisations all over the world.

  • More than 90% of employees, HR professionals and CEOs said that empathy is important.
  • Employees believe that workplace empathy inspires the workforce to be more motivated and productive
  • 77% of workers indicated that they would be willing to work more hours for a more empathetic workplace and 60% would actually accept a lower salary for the same.
  • 92% of HR professionals indicated that a compassionate workplace is a major factor for employee retention.
  • 80% of millennials noted that they would leave their current job if their office became less empathetic and 66% of Baby Boomers also shared this sentiment.

The study did however show a disconnect between what the leadership thought of the organisational culture and what the employees thought. Only 48% of the employees believe companies as a whole are empathic, versus 68% of CEOs.

In order to create an empathic culture in the organisation, the leadership cannot be passive and hope that the culture will shape itself into what is desired. The tone is set at the top, but there are a number of interventions that may be helpful in empathy becoming central to the culture of the organisation. These include:

  • Communicating the importance of empathy and sensitising managers to the need and usefulness of empathy. Hold them accountable for their actions.
  • Training managers on how to become more empathic and how to instil it in their subordinates.
  • Adding empathic interpersonal relationship building to performance agreements.
  • Demonstrate that the mental health of employees is important.
  • Appoint empathy champions throughout the organisation whose job it is to signal empathy pain-points to the leadership.

 

Building an empathic culture is not something that happens overnight, especially not if the leadership has allowed the culture to become one that is cut-throat. One therefore needs to be patient and understand that it is a long-term project. It is however also not a once-off project. Once the desired level is achieved, the same amount of effort is needed to maintain it.

It does however take courage to admit that the culture of the organisation lacks empathy, especially if you have been instrumental in shaping that culture. It takes courage to admit that the organisation is on the wrong path. It takes courage to make the decision to change it and it takes courage to implement that decision. The pandemic and the related shake ups have given leaders the opportunity to use it as an inflexion point and change course. Leaders should ask themselves whether an organisation that lacks caring, as its trademark, is the legacy they would like to leave behind. If not, have the courage to change and change the organisation with you.  

more insights

When People Doing the Right Thing Stand Alone

As we grow older, experience bends and reshapes the things we believe. Sometimes we see the reshaping and are consciously aware of where it takes us. Sometimes we only realise long after the fact that the bending happened. I have a long list of items that have been bent and reshaped in my consciousness. I am pretty sure that some of them are not yet in my conscious mind. I was recently reminded of one of my reshaped opinions when I was asked to speak at the University of Johannesburg’s annual Corruption Summit.
There was a time in my career when a younger version of me stood before professionals and told them that they must do the right thing—even when they had to stand alone. I said it with conviction, because it was the right thing to say. But, with more life experience under my belt, I now understand that I had a too narrow view back then.

Read more >

Culture Before Catastrophe

Growth does not simply make an organisation bigger. It changes the social system through which work gets done.

Recent work with a client in a growth phase reminded me how important it is to be intentional about shaping the right culture for the organization as early as possible. To the credit of the founders of the organization, they did not wait until the culture had become toxic before they recognized that they needed to work on the culture of the organization. They saw the signs of a growing company reshaping itself as new people entered, and immediately reached out for assistance. That was a refreshing experience for me. Normally I get called in when the organization is already in trouble, and when it is far more challenging to turn a dysfunctional or toxic culture around.

Read more >

When Ethics and Compliance Cast a Shadow

Some topics are not easy to write about. Not because we do not know what our views are about them, but because we know how easily the views may be misunderstood—especially by those who prefer a version of pristine ethics and compliance that does not allow for shadows.
I know. Ethics and compliance shadows? That is where you land when you take the liberty—perhaps a little audaciously—of borrowing a concept from one discipline and applying it to another. I have borrowed from psychology and found the result illuminating enough to risk a few furrowed brows.

Read more >